Search
Current issue
Categories
- acquisition lab
- alums
- awards
- candy
- colloquia
- computation
- department news
- dissertation defenses
- events
- faculty news
- glsa
- grad-student news
- grants
- graphs
- issues
- 04:04 (2006-02-16)
- 04:05 (2006-02-23)
- 04:06 (2006-03-02)
- 04:07 (2006-03-09)
- 04:08 (2006-03-16)
- 04:09 (2006-03-30)
- 04:10 (2006-04-06)
- 04:11 (2006-04-13)
- 04:12 (2006-04-20)
- 04:13 (2006-04-27)
- 04:14 (2006-05-04)
- 04:15 (2006-05-11)
- 04:16 (2006-05-18)
- 04:17 (2006-06-29)
- 04:18 (2006-07-27)
- 04:19 (2006-08-31)
- 04:20 (2006-09-07)
- 04:21 (2006-09-14)
- 04:22 (2006-09-21)
- 04:23 (2006-09-28)
- 04:24 (2006-10-05)
- 04:25 (2006-10-12)
- 04:26 (2006-10-19)
- 04:27 (2006-10-26)
- 04:28 (2006-11-02)
- 04:29 (2006-11-09)
- 04:30 (2006-11-16)
- 04:31 (2006-11-23)
- 04:32 (2006-11-30)
- 04:33 (2006-12-07)
- 04:34 (2006-12-14)
- 04:35 (2006-12-21)
- 05:01 (2007-02-01)
- 05:02 (2007-02-08)
- 05:03 (2007-02-15)
- 05:04 (2007-02-22)
- 05:05 (2007-03-01)
- 05:06 (2007-03-08)
- 05:07 (2007-03-15)
- 05:08 (2007-03-29)
- 05:09 (2007-04-05)
- 05:10 (2007-04-12)
- 05:11 (2007-04-19)
- 05:12 (2007-04-26)
- 05:13 (2007-05-03)
- 05:14 (2007-05-10)
- 05:15 (2007-05-17)
- 05:16 (2007-05-24)
- 05:17 (2007-05-31)
- 05:18 (2007-06-28)
- 05:19 (2007-07-26)
- 05:20 (2007-08-30)
- 05:21 (2007-09-06)
- 05:22 (2007-09-13)
- 05:23 (2007-09-20)
- 05:24 (2007-09-27)
- 05:25 (2007-10-04)
- 05:26 (2007-10-11)
- 05:27 (2007-10-18)
- 05:28 (2007-10-25)
- 05:29 (2007-11-01)
- 05:30 (2007-11-08)
- 05:31 (2007-11-15)
- 05:32 (2007-11-22)
- 05:33 (2007-11-29)
- 05:34 (2007-12-06)
- 05:35 (2007-12-13)
- 06:01 (2008-01-24)
- 06:02 (2008-01-31)
- 06:03 (2008-02-07)
- 06:04 (2008-02-14)
- 06:05 (2008-02-21)
- 06:06 (2008-02-28)
- 06:07 (2008-03-06)
- 06:08 (2008-03-13)
- 06:09 (2008-03-20)
- 06:10 (2008-03-27)
- 06:11 (2008-04-03)
- 06:12 (2008-04-10)
- 06:13 (2008-04-17)
- 06:14 (2008-04-24)
- 06:15 (2008-05-01)
- 06:16 (2008-05-08)
- 06:17 (2008-05-15)
- 06:18 (2008-06-26)
- 06:19 (2008-07-31)
- 06:20 (2008-08-28)
- 06:21 (2008-09-04)
- 06:22 (2008-09-11)
- 06:23 (2008-09-18)
- 06:24 (2008-09-25)
- 06:25 (2008-10-02)
- 06:26 (2008-10-09)
- 06:27 (2008-10-16)
- 06:28 (2008-10-23)
- 06:29 (2008-10-30)
- 06:30 (2008-11-06)
- 06:31 (2008-11-13)
- 06:32 (2008-11-20)
- 06:33 (2008-12-04)
- 06:34 (2008-12-11)
- 06:35 (2008-12-18)
- 07:01 (2009-01-22)
- 07:02 (2009-01-29)
- 07:03 (2009-02-05)
- 07:04 (2009-02-12)
- 07:05 (2009-02-19)
- 07:06 (2009-02-26)
- 07:07 (2009-03-05)
- 07:08 (2009-03-12)
- 07:09 (2009-03-26)
- 07:10 (2009-04-02)
- 07:11 (2009-04-09)
- 07:12 (2009-04-16)
- 07:13 (2009-04-23)
- 07:14 (2009-04-30)
- 07:15 (2009-05-07)
- 07:16 (2009-05-14)
- 07:17 (2009-05-21)
- 07:18 (2009-09-09)
- 07:19 (2009-09-16)
- 07:20 (2009-09-23)
- 07:21 (2009-10-01)
- 07:22 (2009-10-07)
- 07:23 (2009-10-14)
- 07:24 (2009-10-22)
- 07:24 (2009-10-28)
- 07:25 (2009-10-29)
- 07:26 (2009-11-11)
- 07:27 (2009-11-18)
- jobs
- miscellany
- phonetics lab
- phonology group
- photo albums
- prosody group
- publications/presentations
- semantics reading group
- syntax reading group
- undergrad news
- visiting scholars
- whisc
Other Ling Newsletters
« Chris Barker in Semantics Reading Group | Main | An Important Announcement from the Candy Monsters»
Chris Barker Colloquium
Chris Barker
NYU
Quantificational binding does not require c-command
Friday, October 17, 3:30 pm, Machmer W-26
Party at 7:00 pm at the Potts house
Abstract
For the past 25 years, the field has labored under the assumption that a quantificational binder must c-command any pronoun that it binds. This is despite well-known systematic counterexamples, including binding out of DP ("Everyone's father loves her") and donkey anaphora ("If John sees a donkey, he beats it"). I consider how the c-command requirement became the standard wisdom, survey a wide variety of counterexamples, both well-known and new, and conclude that we should abandon the c-command requirement, at least for quantificational binding.
But how could a grammar work in which binding ignores c-command? I will describe a formal system developed in joint work with Chung-Chieh Shan (Rutgers) based on continuations. I show how the system provides analyses of binding out of DP while still accounting for a range of crossover facts. Finally, I show how this approach allows for a new account of donkey anaphora on which the indefinite antecedent ("a donkey") takes scope over and binds the donkey pronoun in the same manner as any quantificational binding relationship.